In partnership with

The Systems That Survive: Issue #7

Merchant Ship Collective | Education Catalyst Series

A System Designed for Order — Not Understanding

PBIS entered American public education with a promise: predict behavior, reinforce it, and create calmer classrooms. For administrators overwhelmed by rising needs, it appeared to offer stability.

But the reality is far more complicated.

PBIS does not foster emotional growth, internal regulation, or meaningful skill-building. Instead, it produces a culture of outward compliance and inward confusion — particularly for students whose behaviors are rooted in trauma, disability, or unmet developmental needs.

Yet PBIS remains one of the most widely adopted behavior frameworks in the country, not because it works, but because of the powerful network of organizations, trainers, consultants, and policymakers invested in keeping it alive.

The system survives because adults benefit from the illusion of order.
Children pay the cost.

A Behaviorist Model in a Post-Trauma World

PBIS relies on a mid-century behaviorist assumption:
If you reward positive behaviors and respond consistently to negative ones, students will learn to self-regulate.

But this model collapses under modern child development research.

Children today are navigating chronic stress, unstable housing, untreated anxiety, sensory overload, and developmental needs that PBIS was never designed to understand. When behavior is a survival response, not a deliberate choice, token systems and reward charts cannot intervene.

The behaviorist model treats emotion as something to be controlled — not understood.
It treats dysregulation as misbehavior — not communication.
It treats children as predictable — when human development is anything but.

PBIS rewards performance, not progress.

Why PBIS Fails Students With the Highest Needs

PBIS tends to “work” for students who were already functioning well. They respond predictably to incentives, maintain stable routines, and rarely require support beyond structure.

But for students with autism, ADHD, trauma histories, anxiety disorders, language delays, or sensory processing challenges, PBIS becomes a revolving door of failure.

The breakdown happens because PBIS:

• interprets trauma responses as defiance

• labels communication differences as disobedience

• assumes self-regulation skills students may not yet possess

• rewards masking rather than authentic expression

The system reduces behavior to compliance while completely ignoring neurological, emotional, and developmental realities.

A support system that repeatedly fails the same children is not a support system.
It is an inequity machine.

The PBIS Lobby: Why Ineffective Systems Flourish

Despite its limitations, PBIS has a powerful ecosystem behind it — one that thrives financially regardless of student outcomes. Districts across the country purchase PBIS training, consulting sessions, software, data platforms, reward systems, and “tiered intervention” packages.

Millions in federal and state dollars flow through this pipeline each year.

The financial structure surrounding PBIS includes:

• national conferences and certification programs

• state-level mandates tied to grant funding

• EdTech companies selling PBIS tracking platforms

• large firms offering “tiered behavior intervention” subscriptions

In this ecosystem, success is measured not by student well-being but by implementation fidelity and compliance metrics.

A well-funded system does not have to be effective.
It only has to be marketable.

The Human Cost: How PBIS Reshapes School Culture

PBIS changes more than behavior systems — it changes school identity.

Students quickly learn that emotional expression is dangerous, mistakes are public, and worthiness is conditional. Many internalize the message that they are “good” only when they perform predictably.

Teachers feel the pressure to document behaviors, manage reward structures, and teach scripted “expectation lessons” that leave little room for authentic connection. When the system does not work, educators—rather than the system—are blamed for poor implementation.

Families, especially those of neurodivergent or trauma-impacted students, experience PBIS as a cycle of repeated communication without meaningful intervention. They receive charts, reports, and behavior goals, but not support for the underlying needs driving their child’s behavior.

Communities lose resources that could have been directed toward counselors, social workers, mental-health staff, smaller class sizes, and restorative practices.

PBIS consumes funding that should be used to care for children — not control them.

FACTS & STATISTICS

• PBIS shows no consistent long-term reduction in suspensions or referrals when implemented at scale (Education Week Research Center, 2021).

• Students with disabilities remain twice as likely to be disciplined under PBIS systems (OSEP, 2022).

• Reward systems show no evidence of improving intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 2017).

• PBIS is enforced most aggressively in high-poverty schools, where students are three times more likely to face punitive measures for minor behaviors (APA, 2021).

• Trauma-impacted students show minimal behavioral improvement under PBIS because the model does not address emotional or neurological needs (NCTSN, 2020).

• Districts spend hundreds of millions annually on PBIS-related software, training, and materials despite limited evidence of effectiveness (EdWeek, 2022).

PBIS generates charts, points, tickets, and data —
not behavioral or emotional growth.

A CALL TO ACTION — Choose Humanity Over Control

If behavior systems are going to help students, they must be grounded in what we actually know about human development, not what is convenient to measure.

Schools need:

• trauma-informed staff

• mental-health professionals

• consistent relationships

• predictable routines

• sensory-safe environments

• developmentally aligned expectations

Most of all, they need adults willing to interpret behavior through compassion, not compliance.

Children do not thrive because they earn points.
They thrive because they feel safe, supported, and understood.

It is time to replace systems that reward quiet compliance with systems that cultivate emotional literacy, resilience, and connection.

Education should not be a behavior marketplace.
It should be a human one.

In solidarity,

Lyndsay LaBrier
Merchant Ship Collective

References

American Psychological Association. (2021). Behavioral interventions in high-poverty schools.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2017). Self-determination theory and intrinsic motivation.
Education Week Research Center. (2021). Effectiveness of school-wide PBIS.
EdWeek. (2022). The hidden costs of PBIS implementation.
National Child Traumatic Stress Network. (2020). Trauma and behavior in schools.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2022). Disciplinary disparities in PBIS systems.

Be the Coach Clients Can’t Wait to Join

Maxed out training hours for clients? Here’s how to make 2026 the year you grow your business without burning out.

Kajabi has helped fitness professionals generate millions in online revenue by giving them the tools, strategy, and support to scale. That’s why we’re the go-to platform for instructors shifting into hybrid and online coaching.

Take advantage of our free ‘30 Days to Launch: Scale Your Fitness Business Online’ guide that will give you the step-by-step plan to combine in-person and online programs for more income, freedom, and flexibility.

Get the guide