In partnership with

The Systems That Survive: Issue #5

Merchant Ship Collective | Education Catalyst Series

The Illusion of Innovation

Walk into any American classroom today and you will see a familiar scene: glowing screens, digital dashboards, chromebooks lined on desks, students clicking through modules silently, and teachers monitoring platforms instead of learning.

We were promised innovation.
We were promised engagement.
We were promised personalized learning.

What we received instead was something very different:

A dependency on technology that profits companies more than it benefits children.

Despite decades of research showing that excessive screen time harms attention, memory, language development, and mental health, technology continues to expand in classrooms—not because it improves outcomes, but because it generates recurring revenue.

EdTech is not a tool.
It is an industry.
One that shapes legislation, policy, curriculum, and classroom practice with more influence than any child development expert ever has.

We call it progress.
But it is surveillance wrapped in convenience and sold as innovation.

A System Designed for Profit, Not Pedagogy

The rise of EdTech has followed the same path as standardized testing and curriculum cycles:

1. Manufacture a crisis (“students aren’t engaged,” “kids can’t focus,” “schools are outdated”).

2. Sell the solution (devices, software, learning platforms, analytics dashboards).

3. Lock districts into recurring subscriptions with annual fees.

4. Collect massive amounts of student data in the process.

The beneficiaries are not students and not teachers.
They are corporations whose growth depends on school dependency.

The shift to one-to-one devices did not occur because research supported it.
It occurred because tech companies convinced policymakers that devices were essential—and districts, pressured by narrative, followed.

The result?

Children spend more time on screens than in conversation.
Teachers spend more time managing platforms than teaching.
And schools spend more on devices, repairs, and subscriptions than on people.

This is not innovation.
It is extraction.

The Surveillance Classroom

Most parents have no idea how much data schools collect on their children—or who holds it.

Learning platforms gather:

• student keystrokes

• browsing patterns

• engagement metrics

• speed of completion

• behavioral flags

• predictive analytics about “future success”

EdTech companies call it “personalized learning.”
But the data collected is far more granular than what is needed for instruction.

This information is stored, analyzed, and sometimes sold or shared with third-party vendors. Some companies promise privacy, yet operate under terms that allow them to use student data to train algorithms or refine products.

Children do not know they are being tracked.
Teachers do not know the full scope of the data collected.
Parents do not know how long the data is stored or how it is used.

A generation is being raised inside a digital surveillance system they never consented to.

When Tech Helps — and When It Harms

EdTech is not universally harmful.
There is real, meaningful benefit for students with disabilities.

Assistive technology such as:

• text-to-speech

• speech-to-text

• screen readers

• closed captioning

• visual supports

• organizational apps

• communication devices

These tools give students access, autonomy, and dignity.
They should remain.

But this is where EdTech companies blur the line:
They use genuine accessibility tools to justify mass adoption of devices for all students.

A tool designed for access becomes a pipeline for profit.

Instead of thoughtful integration, we get:

• 1:1 devices for kindergarteners

• online modules replacing meaningful interaction

• algorithm-driven “curriculum”

• digital worksheets instead of instruction

• screens replacing social development

• classroom management becoming digital policing

Accommodations help students with disabilities.
EdTech dependency harms everyone.

Classroom Disruption Disguised as Innovation

Teachers across the country report the same reality:

• constant digital distractions

• games hidden in tabs

• messaging behind the scenes

• students watching videos mid-lesson

• platforms that crash, freeze, or glitch

• tech taking more time than it saves

• increased behavior issues

• decreased attention spans

• 10x more classroom management challenges

Students often do not engage more with digital lessons.
They disengage differently.

Technology is marketed as a behavior solution.
But in practice, it creates more behaviors than it solves.

Missouri’s Cell Phone Law: A Case Study in Unrealistic Policy

Missouri’s new cell phone law—banning phones in classrooms and placing enforcement responsibility on educators—reveals a deeper truth about how disconnected policymakers are from the realities of classrooms.

The law punishes students but burdens teachers.

Educators are expected to:

• search students

• confiscate devices

• store phones

• monitor compliance

• engage in conflict

• enforce inconsistently

• handle parent backlash

• discipline without support

All while teaching.

This approach does not fix distraction.
It creates new confrontations and safety issues.

Yet the same lawmakers supporting the ban simultaneously promote increased technology use in schools—highlighting the inconsistency and influence of tech lobbyists.

The message is clear:
Control the screens that don’t profit corporations.
Mandate the screens that do.

Who Benefits From EdTech Dependency?

Students

Lose attention, social skills, depth of learning, real-world application, creative thinking, and human connection.

Teachers

Juggle dozens of platforms, digital behaviors, device issues, subscription renewals, and constant data entry—while losing instructional autonomy.

Families

Struggle with increased screen time, digital fatigue, homework confusion, surveillance concerns, and the emotional fallout of tech-driven anxiety.

Communities

Pay millions for devices and subscriptions instead of counseling, arts, enrichment, vocational programs, or smaller class sizes.

The Nation

Falls behind countries that emphasize creativity, hands-on learning, human relationships, and stable curriculum frameworks.

And who profits?
The companies who built dependency, sold convenience, and convinced policymakers that screens should replace the century of science behind human learning.

FACTS & STATISTICS

• The U.S. EdTech market is projected to surpass $160 billion by 2030 (Grand View Research, 2022).

• School districts now spend 4–16% of their entire annual budget on technology alone (EdWeek, 2023).

• Students spend an average of 7–8 hours per day on screens when school and home use are combined (Common Sense Media, 2021).

• Excessive screen time is linked to decreased attention, weaker language development, and higher rates of anxiety (APA, 2022).

• Over 90% of EdTech apps collect student data, and 78% share data with third parties (Internet Safety Labs, 2022).

• Teacher surveys show most educators believe technology increases classroom disruption, not engagement (Education Week Research Center, 2022).

• Students score higher on assessments when using low-tech or no-tech formats, especially in reading and math (Harvard CEPR, 2020).

Technology in education isn’t failing.
It’s succeeding at what it was designed to do:
extract data, generate revenue, and shape policy.

A CALL TO ACTION — Reclaim Humanity in Learning

This is the moment for educators, parents, and communities to question the EdTech narrative:

• Why is technology expanding even when research shows harm?

• Why do policymakers push laws that benefit companies but burden teachers?

• Why is student data treated like currency instead of protected like childhood?

• Why are screens replacing skills only human beings can teach?

We must demand:

• transparency about data collection

• limits on surveillance

• balance between tech and human instruction

• funding for people, not platforms

• policies grounded in developmental science

• accommodations without exploitation

• classrooms built on humanity, not algorithms

Children deserve classrooms centered on connection, curiosity, and community—
not dashboards, analytics, and devices designed to monitor them.

Public education belongs to the public.
Let this be the moment we reclaim it from the digital marketplace.

In solidarity,

Lyndsay LaBrier
Merchant Ship Collective

References

American Psychological Association. (2022). Screen time and youth development.
Common Sense Media. (2021). The Common Sense census: Media use by tweens and teens.
Education Week Research Center. (2022). Teacher perspectives on classroom technology.
Grand View Research. (2022). Educational technology market size report.
Harvard Center for Education Policy Research. (2020). The impact of edtech on learning outcomes.
Internet Safety Labs. (2022). State of student privacy report.
EdWeek. (2023). School technology spending trends.

Learn to play the songs you love on piano - with 70% off

flowkey gives you everything you need to play the songs you love on piano – whatever your level.

Start learning from scratch with step-by-step courses, or dive right into the sheet music library and choose from thousands of pieces across all genres, including Classical, Film & TV, Pop, and Jazz. You can follow along with a professional pianist, practice each hand separately, and play sections on repeat until you’ve mastered them – flowkey listens to your playing and waits for you to find the right notes.

Wherever you’re starting from and whatever your learning style, you can make real progress on the piano – and you only need 10 minutes a day. Take advantage of their biggest sale yet and start learning today with 70% off.

Unlock 70% Off