In partnership with

The Systems That Survive: Issue #4

Merchant Ship Collective | Education Catalyst Series

The Curriculum Cycle: A System Built on Profit, Not Progress

Across the United States, schools rewrite, reorder, and replace curriculum on a predictable 5–7 year cycle. Teachers call it “the new program,” parents call it “another change,” and students call it “busywork.” But behind the constant churn lies a truth many have sensed but few openly name:

Curriculum cycles have almost nothing to do with student learning—
and everything to do with corporate revenue.

Textbook and curriculum publishing in the U.S. is controlled by a handful of companies—often called the “textbook cartel”—that have spent decades shaping state standards, influencing policy committees, and crafting market demand for products that rarely improve outcomes but always improve profit margins.

In education, the phrase “evidence-based” often appears in marketing materials, not in policy-making.

How the “Textbook Cartel” Controls What Children Learn

A few corporations dominate more than 80% of the U.S. educational publishing market. These companies:

• lobby state boards of education

• influence standard-setting committees

• sponsor research that supports their products

• market programs as “aligned,” “research-backed,” or “required”

• push new editions regardless of evidence of effectiveness

They sell curriculum packages costing districts millions—reading programs, math modules, intervention kits, assessments, pacing guides, scripted lessons, and digital subscriptions that expire annually.

And every few years, the cycle starts again.

Not because the old program stopped working.
But because corporate revenue depends on replacement, not results.

The Myth of Improvement

Each new curriculum cycle comes with promises:

“Aligned to the new standards.”
“Research-driven.”
“Scientifically validated.”
“Improved outcomes.”
“Boosts student achievement.”

But when we look at national learning trends, none of these claims hold up.

Reading scores have remained largely unchanged for two decades.
Math improvements have stalled.
Achievement gaps have remained persistent.
Teacher workload has increased while instructional freedom has declined.

If these billion-dollar curriculum overhauls were genuinely improving outcomes, we would see it in national data. Instead, outcomes are flat while publishing revenue continues to expand.

That is not an accident.
It is a business model.

Curriculum Cycles Cost More Than Money

Curriculum churn destabilizes the heart of education.

It disrupts learning.

Students barely adjust to one system before being shifted into the next. Skills are repeatedly “reintroduced” rather than deeply built.

It erodes teacher expertise.

Teachers become implementers, not designers. They spend more time learning new programs than honing their craft.

It creates dependency on external products.

Schools become reliant on corporations for pacing, guidance, materials, and assessments.

It undermines consistency.

Students who change schools often move to entirely different systems and sequences.

It conditions educators to accept change without question.

A new curriculum every few years becomes “normal,” even when unsupported by evidence.

And the most damaging consequence:
The focus shifts away from understanding children
and toward understanding programs.

Why the Cycle Never Ends: The Economics Behind It

Publishers design curriculum on a planned obsolescence model:

New standards = new editions
New tests = new alignment
New digital platforms = new subscription fees
New “research” = new marketed products

Districts are told that if they do not adopt the latest version, students will fall behind.

Fear is the most profitable marketing strategy in education.

Meanwhile, research in cognitive psychology, developmental science, and learning theory remains remarkably consistent:

Children need stability, connection, relevance, repetition, and application—
not a new boxed program every time market share begins to dip.

Science has not changed every 5–7 years.
Corporations have simply found it convenient to pretend it did.

How This Affects Students, Families, and Communities

Students

Curriculum churn means repeated exposure to shallow learning, digital fatigue, fragmented instruction, and limited inquiry. Students lose depth, confidence, and real-world readiness.

Families

Parents cannot support learning when programs change constantly, expectations shift, and instructional language is rewritten. Many feel confused or powerless.

Communities

Millions of local tax dollars are spent on curriculum adoption instead of staffing, mental health support, enrichment, or community programming. Rural and urban districts suffer the most, paying for cycles created far from their classrooms.

The Nation

An education system built around corporate profit undermines the country’s intellectual, civic, and economic future. The United States cannot compete globally while restructuring curriculum every few years to satisfy market demands.

Singapore, Finland, Estonia, and Canada—countries that outperform the U.S.—do not cycle curriculum every 5–7 years.
They refine, deepen, and sustain.

America replaces.

STATISTICS THAT REVEAL THE TRUE STORY

• More than 80% of U.S. K–12 curriculum and textbook sales are controlled by a small group of corporations (ETIN, 2019).

• Curriculum adoption cycles occur every 5–7 years regardless of demonstrated improvement (AASA, 2016).

• National reading scores have shown no significant long-term gains in over 30 years despite repeated shifts in curriculum (NAEP, 2022).

• Math achievement has remained largely flat for nearly two decades (NAEP, 2022).

• Over 60% of districts reduced instruction in science, social studies, art, or PE after adopting new curriculum products tied to standardized testing (CEP, 2007).

• The U.S. spends over $10 billion annually on curriculum materials and digital platforms (Education Market Research, 2020).

• Teacher expertise is four times more impactful on student achievement than curriculum programs (Hattie, 2009).

The data confirms what educators have known for decades:
constant curriculum replacement does not improve learning—
but it does increase corporate profit.

A CALL TO ACTION — Reclaim Curriculum From Corporate Control

The curriculum cycle will not stop on its own.
It will stop when communities refuse to fund cycles that don’t benefit students.

We must demand:

• curriculum decisions grounded in child development and learning science

• transparency about publisher influence

• stable frameworks that deepen learning, not replace it

• teacher-led decision-making

• public accountability for curriculum spending

• investment in people, not programs

• community stewardship of curriculum adoption

Children deserve consistency.
Teachers deserve respect.
Communities deserve oversight.

Curriculum should evolve only when research—not corporate revenue—demands it.

Public education belongs to the public.
It’s time to take it back.

In solidarity,

Lyndsay LaBrier
Merchant Ship Collective

References

AASA, The School Superintendents Association. (2016). The evolving role of curriculum leaders.
Center on Education Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era.
Education Market Research. (2020). K–12 curriculum market outlook.
ETIN (Education Technology Industry Network). (2019). Market share in K–12 publishing.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Nation’s Report Card: Reading and mathematics assessments.

Learn to play the songs you love on piano - with 70% off

flowkey gives you everything you need to play the songs you love on piano – whatever your level.

Start learning from scratch with step-by-step courses, or dive right into the sheet music library and choose from thousands of pieces across all genres, including Classical, Film & TV, Pop, and Jazz. You can follow along with a professional pianist, practice each hand separately, and play sections on repeat until you’ve mastered them – flowkey listens to your playing and waits for you to find the right notes.

Wherever you’re starting from and whatever your learning style, you can make real progress on the piano – and you only need 10 minutes a day. Take advantage of their biggest sale yet and start learning today with 70% off.

Unlock 70% Off